Advanced Energy Research Organization

Inventor's Guide

The following criteria are used by AERO in the evaluation of technologies and devices submitted by inventors.

Four Categories of Inventions:

1. Our preference is for a zero point energy (or over unity) device that produces more electrical wattage than it consumes, in the kilowatt range or greater.

2. A second choice would be a device that reduces consumption of fossil fuels by at least 25%. This would be a retrofittable device that works with fuel-injected vehicles.

3. A third choice would be a device that reduces electrical consumption in a home or small business without reducing the work done.

4. A fourth choice would be a device that reduces gravity and can be configured to produce electrical wattage. (Note: we are interested in antigravity in its own right but cannot focus on it until AERO Phase III.)

Here are some examples of devices that will not be considered:

• Not retrofittable to existing vehicles or buildings (that is, the device must be installed at the time of manufacture).

• Only works with carburetors, not with fuel injection.

• Produces torque (turning force) output less than 10 times greater than the input energy (The reason is that, although textbooks would lead one to believe that torque converts to electrical wattage through a simple formula, in fact the calculation may be inaccurate by an order of magnitude).

• Has not been built and tested (you must be able to tell us how you measured its performance).

Further, the only purported zero point energy devices we will consider are those:

• Requiring no input (aka negative resistor), or

• Requiring only a startup input, then runs continuously without additional input, or

• Configured to allow metered measurement of input electrical wattage and metered measurement of output electrical wattage. (The cleanest measurement is DC in and DC out. We can also measure AC, but this is more complex.) Note that we are not interested in voltage or amperage but only in their product; i.e. wattage.

Requirements

Please read these requirements carefully, as they are not flexible. The party submitting a device should be aware of the following requirements:

• The device is functioning and ready to test. Do not submit plans or partially completed devices.

• The device meets one or more of the following performance conditions:

  • If over unity, it generates at least 100 watts of usable reliable output power in excess of input power;

  • If antigravity, it levitates ten or more US pounds in excess of its own weight;

  • If a more efficient fuel system, it increases the mileage per gallon by not less than 25% for a given amount of fuel input (replacements for gasoline are also acceptable).

• You own the device, or legally control it.

• You are willing to disclose how the device works. We are willing to sign standard non-disclosure (confidentiality) agreements (NDA's) prior to examining devices we ask to test. Our standard NDA protects inventors.

• You are willing to license the device to AERO under a normal business arrangement (note: submission does not oblige you to license to us).

• You are willing to have the device transparently tested by AERO, including an on-site initial test, 3 independent lab off-site tests AND independent reproduction of the device by AERO.

What can you tell me about AERO?

Here are some documents you may wish to read:

• Why AERO? An Overview for Inventors
• Questions and Answers for Inventors
• Repository and Inventor Relationship
• AERO Strategic Overview

If you have a device

that you would like AERO to evaluate, please click here to begin the evaluation procedure.

We are sorry, but due to overwhelming demands on our staff time, faxed or mailed submissions will be rejected.